Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai at the hearing with Congressman, why this hearing is becoming Viral. And what silly answers CEO Sundar Pichai stated everything you must know.
Google’s Hearing with Congressman, CEO Sundar Pichai declined the Bias behaviour of Search engine and the data misuse:
The Congress hearing with Sundar Pichai is making headlines, and one of the many reasons it is going viral is due to a mysterious person in the frame that focuses on Google CEO Sundar Pichai. While the Congress hearing, titled
"Transparency & Accountability: Examining Google and its Data Collection, Use, and Filtering Practices"had House Representatives asking a number of questions to Pichai, however, the hearing highlight was a white moustache man', who was spotted sitting right behind him.
A closer look at the frame would probably make you experience a sense of deja vu - the person is a real-life version of the Monopoly Man, or 'Rich Uncle Pennybags,' the character from and mascot of the classic Monopoly board game.
Congress is a v serious place pic.twitter.com/Ro9ddGsU4Z— Ian Madrigal - The Monopoly Man (@wamandajd) December 12, 2018
But who is this 'Monopoly Man'?
Ian Madrigal is an activist with a knack for photobombing congressional hearings, which often involve a lot of prominent people from the corporate world. The Monopoly Man stunt is a protest of the alleged inability of tech companies to self-regulate and protect consumers' personal data, according to Madrigal's statement.
Meanwhile, at the hearing, Pichai fielded questions from representatives ranging from how Google filters search results and controls for bias to how Google manages misinformation on its platforms. In fact, Google CEO Sundar Pichai was asked to explain: "If you Google the word 'idiot' under images, a picture of Donald Trump comes up. How would that happen? How does search work so that that would occur?"
Google CEO Sundar Pichai’s long-awaited Congressional hearing took place on Tuesday.
Pichai testified before Congress on Google+ data breaches, the controversial Chinese-censorship friendly search product, and perceived anti-conservative bias. But, there was one more pressing concern that took center stage to those watching the hearing: Several members of Congress, at least on the House Judiciary Committee, have no idea what they’re talking about when it comes to technology.
Pichai testified before Congress on Google+ data breaches, the controversial Chinese-censorship friendly search product, and perceived anti-conservative bias. But, there was one more pressing concern that took center stage to those watching the hearing: Several members of Congress, at least on the House Judiciary Committee, have no idea what they’re talking about when it comes to technology.
Google is being Bias with its content :
Mr Pichai replied that Google search results.
The main topic of the hearing -- anti-conservative bias within Google’s search engine -- really puts how little Congress understands into perspective. Early on in the hearing, Rep. Lamar Smith claimed as fact that 96 percent of Google search results come from liberal sources. Besides being proven false with a simple search of your own, Google’s search algorithm bases search rankings on attributes such as backlinks and domain authority. Partisanship of the news outlet does not come into play. Smith asserted that he believe the results are being manipulated, regardless of being told otherwise.
Rep. Steve Chabot brought us one of the most unfortunate self-owns of the hearing while discussing Google search and anti-conservative bias. Bringing up his own personal experience, Chabot questioned Pichai on why Google returned so much negative criticism on Republicans’ bill to repeal and replace Obamacare last year. Unaware of the implication that so many outlets reported on the bill in this way simply because, maybe, it was just bad, Chabot went on to bring up a similar experience with the GOP tax plan.
When Iowa Rep. Steve King demanded to know why a nasty image of the Congressman would appear on his granddaughter’s phone while she was playing a game, Pichai had to point out that Google doesn’t make the iPhone. King’s response? It could have been an Android!
Rep. Steve Chabot brought us one of the most unfortunate self-owns of the hearing while discussing Google search and anti-conservative bias. Bringing up his own personal experience, Chabot questioned Pichai on why Google returned so much negative criticism on Republicans’ bill to repeal and replace Obamacare last year. Unaware of the implication that so many outlets reported on the bill in this way simply because, maybe, it was just bad, Chabot went on to bring up a similar experience with the GOP tax plan.
When Iowa Rep. Steve King demanded to know why a nasty image of the Congressman would appear on his granddaughter’s phone while she was playing a game, Pichai had to point out that Google doesn’t make the iPhone. King’s response? It could have been an Android!
World's most powerful and acknowledging search engine Google and still don't know simple facts:
Google CEO Sundar Pichai testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee yesterday, and many of their questions left the SEO community collectively shaking their heads.
At times it was glaringly obvious that Congress had no idea how search engines work.
Other times it seemed like Congress knew little about Google in general, or how the company differed from Apple and Wikipedia.
One might assume the House representatives would show up adequately prepared to speak with the leader of one of the world’s largest companies.
However, if the Mark Zuckerberg hearing taught us anything, it’s not to set our expectations too high.
With that said, let’s look at 5 of the most jaw-droppingly, mind-blowingly, dumb things we heard at yesterday’s hearing.
Google does not manipulate results for individual queries
Questioning the search results showing up for Congressman Steve King, Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu asked Pichai:
At times it was glaringly obvious that Congress had no idea how search engines work.
Other times it seemed like Congress knew little about Google in general, or how the company differed from Apple and Wikipedia.
One might assume the House representatives would show up adequately prepared to speak with the leader of one of the world’s largest companies.
However, if the Mark Zuckerberg hearing taught us anything, it’s not to set our expectations too high.
With that said, let’s look at 5 of the most jaw-droppingly, mind-blowingly, dumb things we heard at yesterday’s hearing.
Google does not manipulate results for individual queries
Questioning the search results showing up for Congressman Steve King, Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu asked Pichai:
“That’s a negative article. But you don’t have a group of people at Google sitting there thinking and trying to modify search results — every time Steve King comes up, a negative article appears. That’s not what’s happening, right?”
Pichai had to explain, matter-of-factly, that Google does not manipulate search results for people in that way.
Google does not make iPhones
Rep. Steve King, after informing Pichai about an unfavorable pop-up that appeared on his granddaughter’s iPhone, asked:
“I’m not going to say into the record what kind of language was used around that picture of her grandfather, but I’d ask you: how does that show up on a seven-year-old’s iPhone, who’s playing a kid’s game?”
Pichai had to inform the Congressman that iPhones are made by a different company.
Congress doesn’t understand how Google image search works
A question came up regarding pictures of Donald Trump showing up when people search for the word “idiot.”
“Right now, if you Google the word ‘idiot’ under images, a picture of Donald Trump comes up. I just did that… How would that happen?”
Pichai had to explain, again, that Google doesn’t manually intervene on any particular search result.
Congress scrutinizes Google’s ability to track users
At one point during the hearing, Rep. Ted Poe asked Pichai whether Google can track his phone as it moves around the room.
Google Maps can do things like that. Any further tracking would depend on the phone’s location settings.
However, rather than giving Pichai a chance to answer the question, Poe followed up with:
“You make $100 million a year… You should be able to answer that question.”
Google accused of liberal bias, over and over again
Throughout the hearing, Google was repeatedly accused of liberal bias.
Rep. Lamar Smith brought up an already-debunked statistic that 96 percent of search results for President Trump are from liberal media sites.
At another point in the hearing, a discussion came up about recently leaked emails in which Google employees are directed to monitor Breitbart for hate speech that violates Google’s policies
However, in the same batch of emails, Google executives concluded that it’s “tough to prove that Breitbart is Hate Speech.”
It also had to be explained to Congress that this was part of a routine review of publishers conducted by its advertising team.
Defending his company again, Pichai had to explain that a rogue Wikipedia edit led to unfavorable information showing up for Rep. Ted Lieu.
The error was quickly corrected. Moreover, Google doesn’t write the Wikipedia entries, it just returns them in search results.
Missed Opportunities
Besides the ill-informed questions lobbed at Google’s CEO, Congress is widely being criticized for the opportunities missed during this hearing.
Congress could have asked Pichai about how Google uses the data it collects on users in advertising.
It can also be argued that Congress didn’t follow-up well enough on the good questions it did ask.
Instead, Pichai was able to easily sidestep questions on important issues.
Perhaps more could have come from this hearing if the House Judiciary Committee spent less time debating each other about Google’s alleged political bias, or lack thereof.
0 Comments