How Amit shah got into power, his Criminal records and Accusations, Behind the truth of BH Loya's murder by Amit Shah.
Amit Shah Gained “Politically & Financially” From Sohrabuddin Encounter: CBI Officer’s Court Deposition. Unrealistic Reality of BJP'S President Amit Shah:
Amitabh Thakur, former Chief Investigating Officer with the Central Bureau of Investigation during the alleged fake encounter case of Sohrabuddin Sheikh, told the Special CBI court on Monday that the then Gujarat Home Minister Amit Shah and four others had gained both financially and politically as a result of the murders.
Sohrabuddin Sheikh was a resident of Gujarat, and the State Police claimed his involvement with a terrorist group. After that, along with his wife Kausar Bi, Sheikh was killed in an alleged fake encounter by the Gujarat and Rajasthan Police in November 2005. Tulsiram, who was a close associate of Sohrabuddin, was also allegedly killed in a fake encounter in December 2006.
Amit Shah was allegedly paid Rs 70 lakhs
The Patel brothers, owners of Popular Builders in Ahmedabad alleged that Sohrabuddin and Prajapati were trying to extract money from them. The brothers allegedly paid Amit Shah Rs 70 lakh in instalments, reported LiveLaw. Apart from Amit Shah, former Deputy Inspector-General of the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) DG Vanzara was also allegedly paid Rs 60 lakh to carry out the investigation.
Thakur, who led the team that interrogated Amit Shah, was also asked whether there were any preliminary enquiries against him for misconduct, bribery, threat and fabrication of evidence. He denied the above and further denied allegations that the then CBI Director Ashwini Kumar had asked him to implicate all accused in the case.
Thakur further said that the police officers who are currently facing trial for the case did not have any political or financial gain from the encounter. He said that the current main accused has no motive to kill Sohrabuddin. The 20 accused were working under the directions of superiors Mr Vanzara, Mr Pandiyan, Mr Dinesh and Mr Chudasma, and all of these had been discharged in the case.
Sohrabuddin’s brother’s statement
After a year-long wait and multiple summons, 46-year-old Rubabuddin Shaikh, complainant and brother of Sohrabuddin Shaikh appeared before the court to record his statement. What ensued was a day-long deposition full of drama and contradicting statements.
The major contradiction in his statement was that Tulsiram Prajapati told him that Sohrabuddin and his wife Kausar Bi was killed in front of his eyes in 2005. This fact came out for the first time after 13 years.
In his earlier statements, he claimed that Prajapati told him that Sohrabuddin and his wife were taken away separately to Ahmedabad and Prajapati was taken to Rajasthan. Rubabuddin, who appeared before the court on November 17, said, “Tulsi (Tulsiram Prajapati) ne mujhe bataya ki mere bhai ko uske aankhon ke saamne maara gaya tha (Tulsi told me that my brother was killed in front of his eyes),” reported The Wire.
He claimed that Prajapati told him that when they were travelling from Hyderabad to Sangli on November 23, 2005, they were kidnapped and taken to Disha Farmhouse in Gujarat and Sohrabuddin was killed in front of his eyes.
When the prosecution asked him if Prajapati mentioned why his life was spared at that time, he said, “Usne kaha main Hindu hoon. Police ki Laskhar-e-Taiba waali theory fail ho jaati, agar mujhe bhi saath mai maar dete (He told me, ‘I am a Hindu. If the police were to kill me along with Sohrabuddin, their theory of him being Lashkar-e-Taiba fugitive would have failed’).” At that time, the police claimed that Sohrabuddin was a Lakshar-e-Taiba ally.
Investigate Death Of Judge Handling Amit Shah Case, Says Justice AP Shah:
courtesy : NDTV
New Delhi: How a judge deciding whether BJP chief Amit Shah should be tried for murder died in December 2014 must be investigated, says one of the most respected judicial voices in the country, Justice AP Shah.
In an interview to NDTV, Justice AP Shah, who retired as the most senior judge of the Delhi High Court and headed the Law Commission said, "His family feels very strongly that there was some foul play in his death. Now there was a long list of circumstances starting from the fact that there was blood on his clothes, and somebody signed the postmortem report as it is. They feel that there is something wrong with the conclusion that he died of cardiac arrest."
His comments are based on a report by Caravan, a news magazine, in which his family said that they are not convinced that his death was a natural one. Justice BH Loya died five months after taking over Amit Shah's case.
In an interview to NDTV, Justice AP Shah, who retired as the most senior judge of the Delhi High Court and headed the Law Commission said, "His family feels very strongly that there was some foul play in his death. Now there was a long list of circumstances starting from the fact that there was blood on his clothes, and somebody signed the postmortem report as it is. They feel that there is something wrong with the conclusion that he died of cardiac arrest."
His comments are based on a report by Caravan, a news magazine, in which his family said that they are not convinced that his death was a natural one. Justice BH Loya died five months after taking over Amit Shah's case.
I feel that it is very necessary that the head of judiciary - either CJI (Chief Justice of India) or Chief Justice of Bombay High Court should look into it," said Justice AP Shah.
Justice Loya's family has also alleged to Caravan that before he died, Justice Loya confided to them that he had been offered a 100-crore bribe by the then Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, Justice Mohit Shah, for a verdict favouring Amit Shah.
Justice Loya's family has also alleged to Caravan that before he died, Justice Loya confided to them that he had been offered a 100-crore bribe by the then Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, Justice Mohit Shah, for a verdict favouring Amit Shah.
NDTV cannot independently verify these allegations; Justice Mohit Shah did not respond to requests for his comments.
Justice AP Shah told NDTV that Justice Mohit Shah, now retired, should step forward and clear his name. "In these recent times the judiciary is suffering from self-inflicted wounds. This is the tallest institution in this country, at least in the perception of many citizens and they have tremendous faith in the judiciary. It is necessary that for the independence of the judiciary that (former) Chief Justice (Mohit Shah) clear his name," he said.
Justice AP Shah told NDTV that Justice Mohit Shah, now retired, should step forward and clear his name. "In these recent times the judiciary is suffering from self-inflicted wounds. This is the tallest institution in this country, at least in the perception of many citizens and they have tremendous faith in the judiciary. It is necessary that for the independence of the judiciary that (former) Chief Justice (Mohit Shah) clear his name," he said.
Criminal record of BJP Govt:
A study released on Wednesday by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) shows that the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has the most number of MPs/MLAs with cases of crimes against women.
The party has also been giving more tickets to these candidates as compared to others. Mayawati's Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and Mamata Banerjee's All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) also gave tickets to candidates with such criminal cases pending against them.
ADR analysed 4,845 out of 4,896 election affidavits of current MPs and MLAs to arrive at these startling figures. These include 768 of 776 affidavits of MPs and 4,077 out of 4,120 MLAs from all states.
The study says that of 1,580 (33 per cent) MPs/MLAs analysed with declared criminal cases, 48 have declared cases related to crimes against women.
Among various recognized parties, BJP has the highest number of such MPs/ MLAs, 12, followed by Shiv Sena with 7 and AITC with 6.
Of these 48 MPs/MLAs with declared cases related to Crimes against women, 45 are MLAs and 3 are MPs.
Maharashtra has the highest number with 12 MPs/ MLAs that have declared cases of crimes against women, followed by West Bengal with 11 and Odisha and Andhra Pradesh each with 5.
The study shows that 327 candidates who have such cases pending against them were given tickets by recognised political parties.
Among the major parties in the last 5 years, 47 candidates with declared cases of crimes against women were given tickets by the BJP.
The second highest number of candidates, 35, were given tickets by BSP followed by 24 candidates from Indian National Congress (INC) who had contested Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha and state Assembly elections.
0 Comments